A review I found last week was written by a blogger whom had a lot to
gripe about regarding a certain piece, but it all boiled down to this:
I didn't like this story because I can't relate to it. This type of
criticism is rampant in high school and college students, and adults
who don't have strong critical thinking skills.
Don't give a story a bad review just because you don't find
it "relateable"* enough.
Here's why:
- Are you saying you can't relate to an experience you have never had
and never expect to have? Come on, yes you can. We don't always share
experiences when we relate, but we do share similar emotions. If you
can't relate to the characters or situation, figure out how the text is
not conveying the right emotions.
- You don't always have to relate to a story to find it worthwhile.
Finding worth in a story you can't relate to is the sign of a reader
with a wide purview of the human condition.
- Saying a story is bad because you've never experienced similar events
makes you sound ignorant. Last semester I sat in Representing
Adolescence in a room of 30+ students two days a week, and listened to
person after person say they didn't enjoy that week's reading material
because they had experienced something different in their childhoods.
This is not how we should think about stories. Not every story is going
to be about you. I'm not saying you should feel like a bad reader for
not enjoying a story you can't relate to. I just don't think you should
go on a rant about how the story is worthless because you don't get it.
I have a rule for giving a story a bad review. If I can speak
articulately about the sloppy writing and the problematic ideology,
I'll write the review. (Sloppy writing includes poor pacing, flat
characters, clunky dialogue, etc.) If the only thing I have to say
is, "I didn't find this interesting because I couldn't relate," then I
won't waste any time or space writing about it; I'll bring it up with
friends or a book club. Again, I don't think the story is bad just
because I can't relate. Sometimes we can't get into a story because the
emotion quality falls flat for us, and we really can't relate or care
about the story. That's totally fine! Ranting about it like a kid who
is pissed he has to write a book report isn't.
*"Relateable" is not a word.
gripe about regarding a certain piece, but it all boiled down to this:
I didn't like this story because I can't relate to it. This type of
criticism is rampant in high school and college students, and adults
who don't have strong critical thinking skills.
Don't give a story a bad review just because you don't find
it "relateable"* enough.
Here's why:
- Are you saying you can't relate to an experience you have never had
and never expect to have? Come on, yes you can. We don't always share
experiences when we relate, but we do share similar emotions. If you
can't relate to the characters or situation, figure out how the text is
not conveying the right emotions.
- You don't always have to relate to a story to find it worthwhile.
Finding worth in a story you can't relate to is the sign of a reader
with a wide purview of the human condition.
- Saying a story is bad because you've never experienced similar events
makes you sound ignorant. Last semester I sat in Representing
Adolescence in a room of 30+ students two days a week, and listened to
person after person say they didn't enjoy that week's reading material
because they had experienced something different in their childhoods.
This is not how we should think about stories. Not every story is going
to be about you. I'm not saying you should feel like a bad reader for
not enjoying a story you can't relate to. I just don't think you should
go on a rant about how the story is worthless because you don't get it.
I have a rule for giving a story a bad review. If I can speak
articulately about the sloppy writing and the problematic ideology,
I'll write the review. (Sloppy writing includes poor pacing, flat
characters, clunky dialogue, etc.) If the only thing I have to say
is, "I didn't find this interesting because I couldn't relate," then I
won't waste any time or space writing about it; I'll bring it up with
friends or a book club. Again, I don't think the story is bad just
because I can't relate. Sometimes we can't get into a story because the
emotion quality falls flat for us, and we really can't relate or care
about the story. That's totally fine! Ranting about it like a kid who
is pissed he has to write a book report isn't.
*"Relateable" is not a word.
1 comment | Leave a comment